My purpose is to consider if, in political society, there can be any legitimate and sure principle of government, taking men as they are and laws as they might be. In this inquiry I shall try always to bring together（ ）with （ ）so that justice and utility are in one way divided.
A.which right permitted...which interest prescribed B.what right permits...which interest prescribed C.what right permits...what interest prescribes D.which right permitted...what interest prescribes
相关问题推荐
[A]All people develop attitudes on public issues: some may not be interested in and others simply may not hear about them. The attitudes that are formed maybe held for various [B]reasons. Thus, four men may all be opposed to higher property taxes [C]but for very different reasons. One man may be for higher taxes in principle, but he [D]opposes them because he is having trouble paying the mortgage on his house.
A.All people B.reasons C.but D.opposes
Physical life, which has often been depreciated from the moral point of view, is not indeed by itself supreme, but it is certain that much evil charged to a bad will is due to morbid or defective conditions of the physical organism. One would be ashamed to write such a truism were it not that our juvenile courts and our prison investigations show how far we are from having sensed it in the past. And our present labor conditions show how far our organization of industry is from any decent provision for a healthy, sound, vigorous life of all the people. This war is shocking in its destruction, but it is doubtful if it can do the harm to Great Britain that her factory system has done. And if life is in one respect less than ideals, in another respect it is greater; for it provides the possibility not only of carrying out existing ideals but of the birth of new and higher ideals. Social interaction likewise has been much discussed but is still very inadequately realized. The great possibilities of cooperation have long been utilized in war. With the factory and commercial organization of the past century we have hints of their economic power. Our schools, books, newspapers, are removing some of the barriers. But how far different social classes are from any knowledge, not to say appreciation, of each other! How far different races are apart! How easy to inculcate national hatred and distrust! The fourth great problem which baffles Wells’s hero in the Research Magnificent is yet far from solution. The great danger to morality in America lies not in any theory as to the subjectivity of the moral judgment, but in the conflict of classes and races. Intelligence and reason are in certain respects advancing. The social sciences are finding tools and methods. We are learning to think of much of our moral inertia, our waste of life, our narrowness, our muddling and blundering in social arrangements, as stupid — we do not like to be called stupid even if we scorn the imputation of claiming to be “good”. But we do not organize peace as effectively as war. We shrink before the thought of expending for scientific investigation sums comparable with those used for military purposes. And is scholarship entitled to shift the blame entirely upon other interests? Perhaps if it conceived its tasks in greater terms and addressed itself to them more energetically it would find greater support. And finally the process of judgment and appraisal, of examination and revaluation. To judge for the sake of judging, to analyze and evaluate for the sake of the process hardly seems worthwhile. But if we supply the process with the new factors of increased life, physical, social, intelligent, we shall be compelled to new valuations. Such has been the course of moral development; we may expect this to be repeated. The great war and the changes that emerge ought to set new tasks for ethical students. As medievalism, the century of enlightenment, and the century of industrial revolution, each had its ethics, so the century that follows ought to have its ethics, roused by the problem of dealing fundamentally with economic, social, racial, and national relations, and using the resources of better scientific method than belonged to the ethical systems which served well their time.1. “The war” the author refers to in the passage is （ ）.2.Which of the following proverbs / sayings best expresses the meaning of the writer’s opinion?3.The last great problem which baffles Wells’s hero in The Research Magnificent is（ ）.4.According to the author, moral progress involves （ ）.5.From the text we may deduce that the author views moral development in the future with （ ）.
A.the civil war B.World War I C.World War II D.the war in Vietnam
问题2：
A.A man’s reach should exceed its grasp. B.A healthy mind is in a healthy body. C.Destiny is in your own hands. D.None of the above.
问题3：
A.sex B.jealousy C.prejudice D.fear
问题4：
A.a process of logical deduction B.insight into the nature of things as they are C.the conviction that moral life is a process involving social inter
The renaissance of the feminist movement during the 1950s led to the Stasist school, which sidestepped the good bad dichotomy and argued that frontier women lived lives similar to the lives of women in the East.
A.discounted B.intensified C.reaffirmed D.dodged
One of the most important non-legislative functions of the U. S. Congress is the power to investigate, which is usually delegated [A]to committees—either [B]standing committees, special committees [C]set for a specific purpose,or joint committees [D]consisted of members of both houses.
A.to B.standing C.set for D.consisted
