Doctors are concerned with health of people from （ ）to the grave.
A.conception B.reception C.deception D.perception
相关问题推荐
“Physician specialty, in addition to being a measure of formal training in the field, is also a proxy for clinical experience,” he says. “If s very difficult to separate out the overlapping concepts: one, that practice makes perfect; two, the effect of the educational and time investments in a clinical problem the physician is simply interested in; and three, the issue of formal training.”Differences between specialist care and generalist care, however, pale in comparison with the finding that both specialists and generalists often fail to put the latest knowledge into practice, contend both Donohoe and Clancy. A report by the U. S. General Accounting Office documented that heart attack survivors who saw cardiologists regularly were more likely to take cholesterol-lowering drugs and beta blockers—which reduce heart rate and blood pressure—than those who received care from a generalist. Even so, these life-prolonging drugs were not prescribed to many patients who appeared to be eligible for them, implying that both generalists and specialists could do better.“Maybe we are focusing too much energy on the differences between generalist and specialist care,” says Donohoe. Perhaps, he adds, “we should focus more intently on improving the quality of communication and cooperation between generalists and specialists and on developing and promoting practice guidelines that might have a much bigger effect on the overall health of Americans.”1.Which of the following questions can most probably come out of the two questions raised in the passage?2.The answers to the two questions suggest that （ ）.3.According to the passage, the better treatment of stroke and heart disease on the part of specialists （ ）.4.Both specialists and generalists, Donohoe and Clancy contend, could do a better job of （ ）.5.Donohoe is trying to shift our attention to （ ）.
'>It seems intuitive that going to a specialist physician will result in more thorough and up-to-date care for whatever ails you. In fact, many studies support this idea—but health-care researchers caution that they may not tell the whole story.The first question is whose patients are sicker? Specialists tend to treat more complicated forms of disease, but generalist—family physicians and general practitioners—are more likely to treat patients with several coexisting diseases.A second question is what counts as the most valuable treatment? Specialists are more familiar with standards of care for the diseases they treat regularly, says Harlan M. Krumholz of Yale University. On the other hand, a generalist may do a better job of coordinating a patient's care and keeping an eye on a person's overall health, says Martin T. Donohoe of the Oregon Health Sciences University in Portland.To further complicate comparisons, many generalists will consult with specialists on complicated cases ,but medical records do not always show that, says Carolyn Clancy of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research in Rockville, Md.That said, stroke patients treated by neurologists are more likely to survive than stroke pat
The molecular influence pervades all the traditional disciplines underlying clinical medicine.
A.specialties B.principles C.rationales D.doctrines
There is currently abroad a new wave of appreciation for breadth of knowledge. Curricula at universalities and colleges and programs in federal agencies extol （赞扬）the virtues of a broad education. For scientists who work in specialized jobs, it is a pleasure to escape in our spare tune to read broadly in fields distant from our own. Some of us have made interdisciplinary study in our occupation, which is no surprise, because much of the intellectual action in our society today lies at the interfaces between traditional disciplines. Environmental science is a good example, because it frequently requires us to be conversant in several different sciences and even some unscientific fields.Experiencing this breadth of knowledge is stimulating, but so is delving deeply into a subject. Both are wonderful experiences that are complementary practical and aesthetic （美学的）ways. They are like viewing the marvelous sculpture of knowledge in two different ways. Look at the sculpture from one perspective and you see the piece in its entirety, how its components connect to give it form, balance, and symmetry. From another viewpoint you see its detail, depth, and mass. There is no need to choose between these two perspectives in art. To do so would subtract from the totality of the figure.So it is with science. Sometimes we gaze through a subject and are reluctant to stop for too much detail. As chemists, we are fascinated by computer sciences or molecular genetics, but not enough to become an expert. Or we may be interested in an analytical technique but not enough to stay at its cutting edge. At other times, we become immersed in the detail of a subject and see its beauty in an entirely different way than when we browse. It is as if we penetrate the surface of the sculpture and pass through the crystal structure to the molecular level where the code for the entire structure is revealed.Unfortunately, in our zeal for breadth or depth, we often feel that it is necessary to diminish the value of the other. Specialists are sometimes ridiculed with names such as "nerd” or "technocrats”, generalists are often criticized for being too “soft” or knowing too little about any one thing. Both are ludicrous （可笑的）accusations that deny a part of the reality of environmental science. Let us not be divided by our passion for depth or breadth. The beauty that awaits us on either route is too precious to stifle, too wonderful to diminish by bickering （争吵）.1.From a broad education to interdisciplinary study, we can see （ ）.2.The commentator would say that the totality of the sculpture of knowledge （ ）.3.Just because we become engrossed in the detail of a subject, according to the comment, does not mean that we （ ）.4.It is commentator ’ s contention that neither specialists nor generalists （ ）.5.Which of the following can be the best title for the comment?
A.the integration of theory with practice B.the enthusiasm for breadth of knowledge C.the rapid division of traditional disciplines D.the confrontation between specialists and generalists
问题2：
A.is mainly composed of two elements B.presents two different points of view C.cannot be perceived from one perspective D.is a whole made up of complementary elements
问题3：
A.can have an understanding of it B.will develop into an expert C.will perceive its entirety D.are interested in it
问题4：
A.have zeal for the totality of the knowledge sculpture B.represent the depth and breadth of knowledge C.are necessarily supposed to belittle the other D.can be qualified as environmental scientists
问题5：
A.Interdisciplinary Study as Our Occupation B.Breath and Depth of Knowledge C.The Ways of Doing Science D.The Beauty of Science
Throughout his political career he has always been in the （ ）.
A.twilight B.spotlight C.streetlight D.torchlight
The government gave a very （ ）explanation of its plan for economic development.
A.comprehensive B.compound C.considerable D.complacent
